You are here
Home > Applied

Applied Ethics in Animal Research by John P Gluck;Tony Dipasquale;F Barbara Orlans

By John P Gluck;Tony Dipasquale;F Barbara Orlans

This quantity is a suite of chapters all contributed by means of people who have awarded their rules at meetings and who take reasonable stands with using animals in examine. particularly the chapters endure of the problems of: notions of the ethical standings of animals, historical past of the equipment of argumentation, wisdom of the animal brain, nature and price of regulatory buildings, how recognize for animals could be switched over from conception to motion within the laboratory. The chapters were tempered by way of open dialogue with people with assorted evaluations and never audiences of real believers. it's the desire of all, that cautious attention of the positions in those chapters will depart reader with a deepened understanding--not unavoidably a hardened place.

Show description

Read Online or Download Applied Ethics in Animal Research PDF

Similar applied books

The Belousov-Zhabotinskii Reaction

In 1958 B. P. Belousov found that the oxidation of citric acid by way of bromate within the presence of cerium ions doesn't continue to equilibrium methodically and uniformly, like so much chemical reactions, yet particularly oscillates with clocklike precision among a yellow and colorless kingdom. See Fig. eleven. 1, p.

The Relation of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics

The connection of theoretical and utilized linguistics has in recent times triggered numer­ ous debates. This quantity originated at one in all them. The essence of many of the chapters, of them all other than Fraser's and Davies's, was once truly awarded on the around desk on "The Relationships of Theoretical and utilized Linguistics," equipped throughout the seventh international Congress of utilized Linguistics, held in Brus­ sels, in August 1984.

Extra resources for Applied Ethics in Animal Research

Sample text

Questions regarding the content of the quality-of-life concept center mainly around the potential discrepancies of a subjective versus a supposedly objective account. Does this variable of quality of life tell us something about how good and valuable the individual perceives his or her life or about how others judge it? Is it a subjective or an objective measure or a combination of both (see Frey 1996, 205)? In the Gluck_025_054_CH03 10/23/01 12:57 PM Page 32 32 Nikola Biller-Andorno case of a combination, what if the two conflict—does the subjective trump the objective or vice versa?

The use of animals in research appears particularly suited to illustrate my concerns about claims to species neutrality and the ascription of moral value and to sketch an alternative approach. This is a problem of considerable theoretical as well as practical importance and priority, cutting across disciplines as well as the usual boundaries between the professional, public, and private. In addition, the emotional and highly controversial quality of this topic can be interpreted to reflect our struggle with an increased moral sensitivity and a fairly unparalleled freedom to act upon it.

The term Umwelt is borrowed from the biologist Jakob von Uexkuell (1864–1944), who, strongly influenced by Kantian philosophy, tried to avoid the pitfalls of both mechanism and vitalism. His work has inspired psychosomatic medicine (see T. von Uexkuell 1997), as well as generations of ethologists, among them Konrad Lorenz and Niko Tinbergen. His definition of life centers on the active creation of an individual environment out of neutral surroundings via a living being’s perceptual and operational organs, which appropriate information from outside and assign meaning to it (see J.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.70 of 5 – based on 9 votes